Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hugo Minney's avatar

I don't know about USA, but here in UK people are opting to feed their children rather than heat their homes, and we have "warm places" - community centres and schools which by law had to heat the building, opening them up after activities for anyone to come in and keep warm and charge their phones.

I have to admit that people can't afford to eat, so egg prices are certainly an issue. But politicians can and do gaslight "everyone else has cheap food, your personal experience should be ignored". With electricity and gasoline, we know it's pretty much the same within a few % all over the country, so we know we can project our experience onto everyone else.

It's the unfairness that gets to people. In UK and europe, the electricity market is based on marginal pricing - the price of the electricity getting to your home is based on the most expensive generator used for that half-hour of power (if it's gas at £1,600 per MWh (£1.60 or around $2 per kWh or domestic unit) then all the electricity, from suppliers happy to supply at £59 per MWh, nuclear at around £80, all gets priced at £1,600. If we just paid the price the generator asked for, they would be happy (that was the price they asked for) and the average price would be much lower!

Mike Keller's avatar

The unprecedented new energy demand is based on unsubstantiated claims of the vital importance of AI. There are a lot of special interest groups poised to make a lot of money on the fad.

If the AI industry needs power, then they can pay all the costs for the needed energy, including infrastructure and elevated fuel cost caused by their unprecedented claimed needs.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?